x.com
Vadim Choi on X: $10k/month just to decide which agent should answer.
@vadimchoi@vadimchoilisted 52m agoreviewed by Jev$10k/month just to decide which agent should answer. not to answer. to decide. group chat + @mentions: fast, cheap, terrible UX. an LLM orchestrator: nice UX, 4-7s and $0.00046 a message. @typesafeai jev: 0.29s median, $0.00002. same decision, $20/month. ❤️ 1 likes on X
- Author
- @vadimchoi
- Use case
- Sales & Leads
- Added
- 2026-09-25
- Cost
- $10
- Time
- 7s
All figures come from the author. Check the source before you quote them.
More in Sales & Leads
- Prasad Pilla on X: AGREED. team built an internal tool using Jev to qualify candidates, and Jev its▲ 0x.com
- Aradhye Agarwal on X: While the whole world is going crazy over Jev, I give you a more skeptical take.▲ 0x.com
- Loutchone on X: bon un peu de serieux, jev peut etre vraiment utile...▲ 0x.com
- Aron | TomorrowLab on X: Jev is actually insane▲ 0x.com38 min
- GitHub - promptgtm-shared/clay-jev-people-ranker: Agent Skill and Python workflow for Clay lead scoring, B2B prospect qualification, and peo▲ 0github.com
- GitHub - ZeroGold/call-coach-ai: Jev powered call coach▲ 0github.com
Jev guides for this use case
- What people actually build with Jev, by use caseAll 21 use cases with live counts from real submissions, plus what each one is actually for.
- How Jev sorts a build into one of 21 use casesThe 21 criteria Jev classifies against, published in full, plus what the reviewer sees and how ambiguity is handled.
- Jev pricing, and what a real build actually costsPer-decision cost, the free-output explanation, and the input-price discrepancy nobody else flags.
Bid history
No bids yet — the first one takes this project straight to the spotlight.