x.com
Aron | TomorrowLab on X: Jev is actually insane
@AronTomorrowLab@AronTomorrowLablisted 52m agoreviewed by JevJev is actually insane 605,461,046 tokens later: only 47% of the leads in our live campaigns actually fit the client's ICP we used to check ICP fit by sending agents to read every website (Claude Code or Clay). 409 companies took 38 minutes. fine for one campaign, but ofc not scalable for a whole database. now we write the client's ICP once (client.md), and Jev runs every company against it. 100k companies in a few minutes less volume, but better leads (and only relevant replies) ❤️ 0 likes on X
- Author
- @AronTomorrowLab
- Use case
- Sales & Leads
- Added
- 2026-09-25
- Time
- 38 min
All figures come from the author. Check the source before you quote them.
More in Sales & Leads
- Prasad Pilla on X: AGREED. team built an internal tool using Jev to qualify candidates, and Jev its▲ 0x.com
- Aradhye Agarwal on X: While the whole world is going crazy over Jev, I give you a more skeptical take.▲ 0x.com
- Loutchone on X: bon un peu de serieux, jev peut etre vraiment utile...▲ 0x.com
- Vadim Choi on X: $10k/month just to decide which agent should answer.▲ 0x.com$107s
- GitHub - promptgtm-shared/clay-jev-people-ranker: Agent Skill and Python workflow for Clay lead scoring, B2B prospect qualification, and peo▲ 0github.com
- GitHub - ZeroGold/call-coach-ai: Jev powered call coach▲ 0github.com
Jev guides for this use case
- What people actually build with Jev, by use caseAll 21 use cases with live counts from real submissions, plus what each one is actually for.
- How Jev sorts a build into one of 21 use casesThe 21 criteria Jev classifies against, published in full, plus what the reviewer sees and how ambiguity is handled.
- Jev pricing, and what a real build actually costsPer-decision cost, the free-output explanation, and the input-price discrepancy nobody else flags.
Bid history
No bids yet — the first one takes this project straight to the spotlight.