x.com
Prasad Pilla on X: AGREED. team built an internal tool using Jev to qualify candidates, and Jev its
@prasad_pilla@prasad_pillalisted 51m agoreviewed by JevAGREED. team built an internal tool using Jev to qualify candidates, and Jev itself is genuinely impressive at what it’s designed todo. but recruiting is hard. there are too many variables that don’t fit neatly into a rubric: context, trajectory, ownership, quality of work, potential, and the signals you only catch by actually digging into someone’s work tbh https://x.com/idleshubh/status/2102429846660079971?s=20 ❤️ 5 likes on X
- Author
- @prasad_pilla
- Use case
- Sales & Leads
- Added
- 2026-09-25
All figures come from the author. Check the source before you quote them.
More in Sales & Leads
- Aradhye Agarwal on X: While the whole world is going crazy over Jev, I give you a more skeptical take.▲ 0x.com
- Loutchone on X: bon un peu de serieux, jev peut etre vraiment utile...▲ 0x.com
- Aron | TomorrowLab on X: Jev is actually insane▲ 0x.com38 min
- Vadim Choi on X: $10k/month just to decide which agent should answer.▲ 0x.com$107s
- GitHub - promptgtm-shared/clay-jev-people-ranker: Agent Skill and Python workflow for Clay lead scoring, B2B prospect qualification, and peo▲ 0github.com
- GitHub - ZeroGold/call-coach-ai: Jev powered call coach▲ 0github.com
Jev guides for this use case
- What people actually build with Jev, by use caseAll 21 use cases with live counts from real submissions, plus what each one is actually for.
- How Jev sorts a build into one of 21 use casesThe 21 criteria Jev classifies against, published in full, plus what the reviewer sees and how ambiguity is handled.
- Jev pricing, and what a real build actually costsPer-decision cost, the free-output explanation, and the input-price discrepancy nobody else flags.
Bid history
No bids yet — the first one takes this project straight to the spotlight.