x.com
VertrAI on X: @OpenRouter @typesafeai 154ms vs 860ms is a useful routing result, scoped to the
@vertr_ai@vertr_ailisted 49m agoreviewed by Jev@OpenRouter @typesafeai 154ms vs 860ms is a useful routing result, scoped to these 200 synthetic classification cases—not a blanket ChatGPT comparison. We credited your latency and cost charts in our Jev video, alongside the game/browser demos: https://x.com/vertr_ai/status/2101921554116592055 ❤️ 1 likes on X
- Author
- @vertr_ai
- Use case
- Routing & Model Choice
- Added
- 2026-09-25
- Time
- 154ms
All figures come from the author. Check the source before you quote them.
More in Routing & Model Choice
- Hassan on X: Just trained Tev1 0.8B, a tiny Jev-like classifier.▲ 0x.com~50ms
- OrcDev on X: TanStack AI just shipped subagents.▲ 0x.com
- امیرحسین اسلامی on X: اولین تجربهی خودم با JEV 👀▲ 0x.com
- Harsh Singh on X: i created a 404 page that fixes your typos for you, and redirects you to the cor▲ 0x.com
- Oliver Prompts on X: grok 4.7 thinks. jev reacts. together, one ai agent now thinks twice before ever▲ 0x.com$0.042about 239ms
- Cesar Favero on X: botei o jev no codexrouter, sinto o trabalho muito mais otimizado, vou criar um ▲ 0x.com
Jev guides for this use case
- Jev vs LLM: a decision model is not a smaller text modelWhy a decision model and a text model aren't substitutes, where the boundary sits, and the cost math.
- How Jev sorts a build into one of 21 use casesThe 21 criteria Jev classifies against, published in full, plus what the reviewer sees and how ambiguity is handled.
- Jev pricing, and what a real build actually costsPer-decision cost, the free-output explanation, and the input-price discrepancy nobody else flags.
Bid history
No bids yet — the first one takes this project straight to the spotlight.